New Judgment: Re an application by the NIHRC for Judicial Review (NI) [2018] UKSC 27
07 Thursday Jun 2018
Matrix Legal Support Service New Judgments
Share it
On appeal from: [2017] NICA 42
This appeal considered whether the Offences against the Person Act 1861, ss 58 and 59 and the Criminal Justice Act (NI) 1945, s 25 are incompatible with the ECHR, arts 3, 8 and 14 in failing to provide an exception to the prohibition on the termination of pregnancy in Northern Ireland in cases of serious malformation of the unborn child/foetus or pregnancy as a result of rape or incest. It also considered whether the Northern Ireland Act 1998 entitles the appellant to bring proceedings under the Human Rights Act 1998, and to seek a declaration of incompatibility under s 4, other than in respect of an identified unlawful act or acts.
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by a majority. The majority considered that the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission did not have standing to bring the proceedings, and as such the Court did not have jurisdiction to make a declaration of incompatibility. This is because, though the Commission need not be a victim in instituting human rights proceedings under the Northern Ireland Act 1998, s 71(2B) and (2C), there must be a specific, identifiable actual or potential victim of an unlawful act to which the proceedings relate.
Though a s 4 declaration of incompatibility was not open to the Court having decided it had no jurisdiction, it nonetheless considered the point. A majority of the Supreme Court held that the current law in Northern Ireland is disproportionate and incompatible with ECHR, art 8 insofar as it prohibits abortion in cases of fatal foetal abnormality, and pregnancy as a result of rape or incest, though only a minority considered that the law is incompatible with art 3.
For judgment, please download: [2018] UKSC 27
For Court’s Press Summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary
For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII
To watch the hearing, please visit: Supreme Court Website (24 Oct 2017 morning session) (24 Oct 2017 afternoon session) (25 Oct 2017 morning session) (25 Oct 2017 afternoon session) (26 Oct 2017 morning session) (26 Oct 2017 afternoon session)
1 comment
Jon Holbrook said:
12/06/2018 at 14:50
In this article I challenge Lady Hale’s enthusiasm for judge-made policy:
http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/another-step-towards-juristocracy/21487