Archive for the ‘New Judgments’ Category
-
New Judgment: R (Forge Care Homes Ltd & Ors) v Cardiff and Vale University Health Board & Ors [2017] UKSC 56
02 Aug 2017On appeal from [2016] EWCA Civ 26 This case considered whether the NHS (through Local Health Boards) is required to…
-
New Judgment: BPP Holdings Ltd & Ors v Commissioners for HMRC [2017] UKSC 55
26 Jul 2017On appeal from [2016] EWCA Civ 121. This appeal considered whether the Tax Chamber of the First-tier Tribunal erred in…
-
New Judgment: Sadovska & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland) [2017] UKSC 54
26 Jul 2017On appeal from [2016] CSIH 51 This appeal considered whether the Inner House erred in failing to hold that, in…
-
New Judgment: Birch v Birch [2017] UKSC 53
26 Jul 2017On appeal from [2015] EWCA Civ 833 This appeal considered whether, when varying a consent order, the court should apply…
-
New Judgment: McDonald v Newton or McDonald (Scotland) [2017] UKSC 52
26 Jul 2017On appeal from [2015] CSIH 61. This appeal considered whether the majority of the Extra Division of the Inner House…
-
New Judgment: R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51
26 Jul 2017On appeal from: [2015] EWCA Civ 935. Appeal in judicial review proceedings considering whether fees in the employment tribunal system…
-
New Judgment: R (Hemming (t/a Simply Pleasure Ltd) & Ors) v Westminster City Council [2017] UKSC 50
19 Jul 2017Following on from a judgment made by The Court of Justice of the European Communities This appeal considered whether…
-
New Judgment: Khuja (formerly known as PNM) v Times Newspapers Ltd & Ors [2017] UKSC 49
19 Jul 2017On appeal from [2014] EWCA Civ 1132. Arises out of the trial of nine men on charges involving organised child…
-
New Judgment: Eli Lilly & Co v Actavis UK Ltd & Ors [2017] UKSC 48
12 Jul 2017On appeal from [2015] EWCA Civ 555; [2015] EWCA Civ 556. This appeal considered whether a new pemetrexed based cancer…
-
New Judgment: Walker v Innospec Ltd & Ors [2017] UKSC 47
12 Jul 2017On appeal from [2015] EWCA Civ 1000. This appeal considered whether a male employee is entitled to require a pension…