Archive for the ‘Case Comments’ Category
-
Case Comment: W (children) [2010] UKSC 12
08 Mar 2010On Wednesday 3 March 2010 the Supreme Court delivered judgment in W (children) [2010] UKSC 12, one day after hearing…
-
Case comment: Martin v HM Advocate; Miller v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 10: Part 2: Aristotle and Plato in the Supreme Court
07 Mar 2010What has caused the clear split in approach and unprecedented change in the tone of dissent which is seen in…
-
Case comment: Martin v HM Advocate; Miller v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 10: Part 1
06 Mar 2010The decision of the UK Supreme Court in HM Advocate v. Martin and Miller [2010] UKSC 10 is the first…
-
Case Comment: Norris v Government of United States of America [2010] UKSC 9
28 Feb 2010In the case of Norris v Government of the United States ([2010] UKSC 9) In the absence of any real…
-
R on the application of Gaines-Cooper v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2010] EWCA Civ 83
25 Feb 2010As the Blog reported at the time, on 16 February 2010, the Court of Appeal (Ward, Dyson and Moses LJJ)…
-
Case Comments: Allison v Her Majesty’s Advocate [2010] UKSC 6 and McInnes v Her Majesty’s Advocate [2010] UKSC 7
14 Feb 2010In Allison v HM Advocate ([2010] UKSC 6) the UK Supreme Court heard argument upon, and determined the merits of,…
-
Case Comment: Gray’s Timber Products v HMRC [2010] UKSC 4
08 Feb 2010Out of the crooked timber of Schedule 22, Finance Act 2003, no straight thing was ever made On 3 February…
-
Case Comment: HM Treasury v Ahmed [2010] UKSC 2
02 Feb 2010This appeal, previewed here, was the first to be heard by the new Supreme Court, and was specially chosen for…
-
Case Comment: Application by Guardian News Media, in HM Treasury v Ahmed [2010] UKSC 1
01 Feb 2010In its first judgment of the year, Application by Guardian News and Media, in HM Treasury v Ahmed ([2010] UKSC…
-
Case Comment: Ofcom v The Information Commissioner [2010] UKSC 3
29 Jan 2010On 27 January the Court (Lords Hope, Saville, Mance, Collins and Lady Hale) handed down judgment in Ofcom v The Information…