New Judgment: Aspen Underwriting Ltd & Ors v Credit Europe Bank NV; & anor case [2020] UKSC 11

On appeal from: [2017] EWHC 1904 (Comm) and [2018] EWCA Civ 2590.

The High Court of England and Wales does not have jurisdiction to hear claims to recover sums paid under a settlement agreement relating to the loss of an insured vessel.

Inter alia, under EU law, a jurisdiction agreement will only bind a party if there is actual consensus between the parties that is clearly and precisely demonstrated. As an equitable assignee, the Bank did not take on the Owners’ obligations under the Policy. Not being a party to the Policy, it is not required to submit to the jurisdiction of the English courts in the action brought by the insurers.

The Supreme Court finds that the Insurers’ claims against the Bank are “matters relating to insurance” within the meaning of section 3 of the Brussels Regulation Recast (Regulation (EU) 1215/2012), which provides that an insurer may only bring proceedings in the courts of the Member State where the defendant is domiciled.

For judgment, please download: [2020] UKSC 11
For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary
For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII

To watch the hearing please visit: Supreme Court website 4 Nov 2019 (morning session and afternoon session) and 5 Nov 2019 (morning session and afternoon session)

 

Leave a reply on "New Judgment: Aspen Underwriting Ltd & Ors v Credit Europe Bank NV; & anor case [2020] UKSC 11"