Archive for the ‘New Judgments’ Category
-
New Judgment: MB v Secretary of State for Work & Pensions [2016] UKSC 53
10 Aug 2016On appeal from: [2014] EWCA Civ 1112 The Supreme Court made the decision to refer a question to the Court…
-
New Judgment: Moreno v The Motor Insurers’ Bureau [2016] UKSC 52
03 Aug 2016On appeal from: [2015] EWHC 1002 (QB) The Supreme Court has unanimously allowed an appeal, in a case that required…
-
New Judgment: The Christian Institute & Ors v The Lord Advocate (Scotland) [2016] UKSC 51
28 Jul 2016On appeal from: [2015] CSIH 64 The Supreme Court has unanimously allowed the appeal, in a case where four registered…
-
New Judgment: Hastings Borough Council v Manolete Partners Plc [2016] UKSC 50
27 Jul 2016On appeal from: [2014] EWCA Civ 562. The Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed the appeal of the appellant Council, in…
-
New Judgment: Secretary of State for the Home Department v Vomero [2015] UKSC 49
27 Jul 2016On appeal from: [2012] EWCA Civ 1199. The Secretary of State sought to deport the defendant under the Immigration (European…
-
New Judgment: Hayward v Zurich Insurance Company plc [2016] UKSC 48
27 Jul 2016On appeal from: [2015] EWCA Civ 327 The Supreme Court has unanimously allowed the appeal of an insurer, in a…
-
New Judgment: Bailey & Anor v Angove’s PTY Ltd [2016] UKSC 47
27 Jul 2016On appeal from: [2014] EWCA Civ 215 The appellant, Angrove’s PTY is an Australian winemaker, which employed D&D Wines International…
-
New Judgment: Lee-Hirons v Secretary of State for Justice [2016] UKSC 46
27 Jul 2016On appeal from: [2014] EWCA Civ 553 The Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed the appellant’s appeal, in a case which…
-
New Judgment: Versloot Dredging BV & Anor v HDI Gerling Industrie Versicherung AG & Ors [2016] UKSC 45
20 Jul 2016On appeal from: [2014] EWCA Civ 1349. The appellant was the owner of a vessel that had been incapacitated by…
-
New judgment: Willers v Joyce & Anor [2016] UKSC 44
20 Jul 2016On appeal from [2015] EWHC 1315. The Supreme Court’s unanimous judgment specifies the circumstances in which the JCPC can decide…