Archive for the ‘New Judgments’ Category
-
New Judgment: Rhuppiah v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] UKSC 58
14 Nov 2018On appeal from: [2016] EWCA Civ 803 This appeal considered the meaning of precarious in the Nationality Immigration and Asylum…
-
New Judgment: Regency Villas Title Ltd & Ors v Diamond Resorts (Europe) Ltd & Ors [2018] UKSC 57
14 Nov 2018On appeal from: [2017] EWCA 238 and [2015] EWHC 3564 (Ch) This appeal considered, in the context of easements, what…
-
New Judgment: Warner-Lambert LLC v Generics (UK) Ltd t/a Mylan & Anor [2018] UKSC 56
14 Nov 2018On appeal from: [2016] EWCA Civ 1006 This appeal considered whether (and what) role plausibility should play in the statutory…
-
New Judgment: Barnardo’s v Buckinghamshire & Ors [2018] UKSC 55
07 Nov 2018On appeal from: [2016] EWCA Civ 1064 This appeal considered the proper construction of terms of a Pension Scheme in…
-
New Judgment: Dooneen Ltd (t/a McGinness Associates) & Anor v Mond [2018] UKSC 54
31 Oct 2018On appeal from: [2016] CSIH 59 This appeal considered the construction of the expression ‘final distribution’ in a voluntary trust…
-
New Judgment: KO (Nigeria) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] UKSC 53
24 Oct 2018On appeal from: [2016] EWCA Civ 450, [2016] EWCA Civ 932, [2016] EWCA Civ 705, [2016] EWCA Civ 1091 These…
-
New Judgment: Warner v Scapa Flow Charters (Scotland) [2018] UKSC 52
17 Oct 2018On appeal from: [2017] CSIH 13 This appeal considered whether, on a correct reading of the Athens Convention relating to…
-
New Judgment: Nottingham City Council v Parr & Anor [2018] UKSC 51
10 Oct 2018On appeal from: [2017] EWCA Civ 188. The appellant landlord appealed to the Supreme Court contending that the power to…
-
New Judgment: Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50
10 Oct 2018On appeal from: [2017] EWCA Civ 151 This appeal considered whether non-clinically trained reception staff at an A & E…
-
New Judgment: Lee v Ashers Baking Company Ltd & Ors [2018] UKSC 49
10 Oct 2018On appeal from: [2016] NICA 39 This appeal considered whether the appellants directly discriminated against a customer, the respondent, on…
